Q: Can we discuss a difficult topic. Harms of sanctification of things not sanctified by ALLAH SUBHANAUTALA. For example river ganges sanctified and the very populations who revere do defecate, pee, throw any and every filthy materials in mouth of so called sacred mother Ganges?

A:

This is indeed a profound topic worth serious discussion. Wa alaikum assalam wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh.
The Core Problem: Sanctification Without Divine Authority
The Quran addresses this with remarkable clarity. When humans appoint sanctity to things Allah has not sanctified, several interconnected harms follow.

1. Theological Corruption — Shirk in Ibadah
   The root harm is assigning Divine attributes — purity, sanctity, power to bless or purify — to created things. This is precisely what Surah Al-An’am (6:136-140) addresses: people dedicating portions of their harvest and cattle to false partners of Allah. The logic is the same whether it is rivers, trees, cows, or stones.
   The Quran’s verdict is direct: “That is their judgment, and Allah will judge between them concerning that over which they differ.” (6:136)
2. The Ganges — A Case Study in Logical Contradiction
   Your example is extraordinarily powerful precisely because it is self-defeating on its own terms.
   ∙ A people believe the river is their sacred mother goddess (Ganga Mata)
   ∙ That same belief fails to produce the reverence, discipline, and protection that genuine sanctity demands
   ∙ The result: industrial waste, sewage, cremated remains, ritual garbage — all poured into the “sacred”
   This is what happens when sanctity is culturally inherited rather than divinely anchored. There is no rational or moral framework holding the belief accountable.
3. The Islamic Contrast — Taharah Rooted in Tawhid
   Islam’s concept of purity (taharah) is fundamentally different:
   ∙ Water purifies — but water itself must be pure to purify others
   ∙ No river, no well, no Zamzam even — is worshipped
   ∙ Zamzam is honored because Allah caused it — but a Muslim does not throw filth into Zamzam imagining the water’s “divinity” will absorb it
   ∙ The Niyyah (intention) + physical cleanliness + spiritual state must all align — because accountability to Allah is real
4. Sanctification Without Accountability Breeds Moral Chaos
   This is perhaps the deepest harm. When something is sanctified outside of Allah’s framework:
   ∙ There is no Shariah to govern behavior around it
   ∙ There is no Akhirah making people accountable for how they treat it
   ∙ Rituals become performative — dipping in the Ganges “washes sins” regardless of conduct — which destroys moral cause-and-effect entirely
   The Quran warns extensively about this: “And most of them follow nothing but conjecture. Certainly, conjecture can be of no avail against the truth.” (10:36)
5. Civilizational Consequence
   When false sanctity replaces divine guidance:
   ∙ Environmental destruction follows (as with the Ganges)
   ∙ Social inequality is often reinforced through the same religious framework
   ∙ Rational inquiry is suppressed — questioning the sacred river’s pollution becomes taboo
   ∙ Communities become trapped between belief and observable reality, unable to reconcile the two

The Quranic Principle
Allah alone has the authority to declare what is sacred (muharram/muqaddas). When humans usurp that authority — even with sincere devotion — the result is always some form of fasad fil-ard (corruption on earth), whether spiritual, moral, or physical.
“Do they have partners who have ordained for them in religion what Allah has not permitted?” (42:21)

Would you like this developed into a ForOneCreator article — perhaps contrasting the Islamic framework of Taharah with human-invented sanctity systems, using the Ganges as a concrete contemporary example?