Context from Tafheem: This is a pivotal passage. After establishing the pillars of personal worship (fasting, prayer, charity) and social ethics, the Quran now addresses the critical issue of collective self-defense and the establishment of justice. Revealed in Medina when the Muslim community faced existential military threat from the pagan Quraysh and other hostile tribes, these verses provide the foundational ethical framework for fighting (Qital) in God’s cause. They transition the community from a persecuted group to one entrusted with upholding justice, while imposing strict moral constraints.
سورة البقرة (Surah Al-Baqarah)
آية 190
القرآن: وَقَاتِلُوا فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ الَّذِينَ يُقَاتِلُونَكُمْ وَلَا تَعْتَدُوا ۚ إِنَّ اللَّهَ لَا يُحِبُّ الْمُعْتَدِينَ
Translation: Fight in the way of Allah those who fight you but do not transgress. Indeed, Allah does not like transgressors.
Explanation (Tafheemul Quran):
Maududi explains this as the primary, governing principle of Islamic warfare. It contains both a permission and a severe restriction.
· The Permission to Fight: The command “Fight in the way of Allah those who fight you” grants the right of self-defense. It is not a call to aggression. Fighting is permitted only against those who initiate aggression against the Muslim community to persecute them for their faith or drive them from their homes.
· The Absolute Restriction: The immediate, emphatic prohibition: “but do not transgress (la ta’tadu).” Maududi states that I’tidal (transgression) in this context means:
- Initiating Aggression: Starting hostilities without just cause.
- Fighting Non-Combatants: Such as women, children, the elderly, monks, and peasants who are not engaged in fighting.
- Committing Atrocities: Mutilation, torture, excessive killing, or destroying crops, livestock, and places of worship.
· Divine Disapproval: The verse concludes with a powerful deterrent: “Indeed, Allah does not like transgressors.” This places the ethical conduct of war under divine scrutiny.
آية 191
القرآن: وَاقْتُلُوهُمْ حَيْثُ ثَقِفْتُمُوهُمْ وَأَخْرِجُوهُم مِّنْ حَيْثُ أَخْرَجُوكُمْ ۚ وَالْفِتْنَةُ أَشَدُّ مِنَ الْقَتْلِ ۚ وَلَا تُقَاتِلُوهُمْ عِندَ الْمَسْجِدِ الْحَرَامِ حَتَّىٰ يُقَاتِلُوكُمْ فِيهِ ۖ فَإِن قَاتَلُوكُمْ فَاقْتُلُوهُمْ ۗ كَذَٰلِكَ جَزَاءُ الْكَافِرِينَ
Translation: And kill them wherever you overtake them and expel them from wherever they have expelled you. And persecution (fitnah) is worse than killing. And do not fight them at al-Masjid al-Haram until they fight you there. But if they fight you, then kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers.
Explanation (Tafheemul Quran):
This verse elaborates on the scope and justification of the defensive war.
· Active Defense: The commands “kill them wherever you overtake them” and “expel them from wherever they have expelled you” are not for aggression but for actively pursuing and repelling an attacking enemy until the threat is neutralized. It authorizes driving out invaders from Muslim lands just as Muslims were driven out of Mecca.
· The Greater Evil – Fitnah: The key moral justification is stated: “And persecution (fitnah) is worse than killing.” Maududi explains that Fitnah here means “religious persecution”—a systematic effort to force people to renounce their faith through torture, murder, exile, and oppression. This state of Fitnah is declared worse than the killing that occurs in a defensive war to end it. Fighting is sanctioned to eliminate this greater evil and establish freedom of belief.
· Sanctity of the Sacred Mosque: Even in this context, a special restriction is imposed: “do not fight them at al-Masjid al-Haram until they fight you there.” The Ka’bah’s sanctity is so great that Muslims must not initiate fighting within its precincts. However, if the enemy violates this sanctity and attacks there first, then self-defense is permitted even in that sacred space.
· A Consequence, Not a Goal: The final statement, “Such is the recompense of the disbelievers,” clarifies that this defensive fighting is a consequence the aggressors have brought upon themselves by their persecution. It is not a desired end in itself.
آية 192
القرآن: فَإِنِ انتَهَوْا فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ غَفُورٌ رَّحِيمٌ
Translation: And if they cease, then indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.
Explanation: This crucial verse establishes that the objective of fighting is not annihilation but to make the aggression cease. Maududi emphasizes that if the enemy stops fighting and ends its persecution, hostilities must end immediately. At that point, God’s attributes of Forgiveness and Mercy come to the fore, and the door to peace and reconciliation is opened. The war is purely defensive and remedial.
آية 193
القرآن: وَقَاتِلُوهُمْ حَتَّىٰ لَا تَكُونَ فِتْنَةٌ وَيَكُونَ الدِّينُ لِلَّهِ ۖ فَإِنِ انتَهَوْا فَلَا عُدْوَانَ إِلَّا عَلَى الظَّالِمِينَ
Translation: Fight them until there is no persecution (fitnah) and [until] the religion is for Allah. But if they cease, then there is no aggression except against the wrongdoers.
Explanation:
This verse states the ultimate objective of the fighting that has been permitted.
· The Twofold Goal: Muslims are to fight until:
- “There is no persecution (fitnah)”—meaning the organized effort to destroy the Muslim community and force apostasy is completely eliminated.
- “And [until] the religion is for Allah”—Maududi explains this means until the system where people are persecuted for their faith is replaced by one where people have the freedom to worship God according to their conscience without coercion. It is about establishing a just political order where God’s sovereignty in matters of belief is recognized, not about forcing individuals to convert.
· The Condition for Peace Reiterated: The verse concludes by reinforcing the principle from verse 192: “But if they cease, then there is no aggression except against the wrongdoers.” Once the enemy stops its aggression and persecution, all hostility must stop. The only ones against whom action can be taken after that are those “wrongdoers” (zalimun) who continue to commit aggression. This makes peace the default state once the defensive cause is removed.
Summary from Tafheemul Quran Perspective (Verses 190-193):
According to Maududi, these verses lay down the immutable ethics of war in Islam:
- Purely Defensive: Fighting is only permitted in response to active aggression and religious persecution.
- Proportional and Ethical: There must be no transgression—no aggression against non-combatants, no cruelty, no initiating fight in sacred places.
- Objective-Driven: The sole aims are to end persecution (fitnah) and establish a system where faith is free from coercion.
- Peace as the Priority: Hostilities must cease the moment the enemy stops its aggression. The ultimate desire is for peace and reconciliation under justice.
This framework distinguishes Islamic Jihad from unrestrained warfare, grounding it in the defense of fundamental human rights (life and belief) and strict moral boundaries. Would you like me to continue with the next section (verses 194-195), which further elaborates on the principles of fighting and spending in God’s cause?