Please open the link to listen the recitation and translation : https://surahquran.com/sorah-english-19.html

Quranic perspectives

Podcast..

https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/c18e7e22-5a10-4693-8fc9-630e15f510c4/audio

By Deepseek

Certainly! Here is the translation and explanation of Quran 19:88-92 from Tafheem-ul-Quran by Syed Abul Ala Maududi:

Translation (19:88-92):

88. And they say: “The Most Merciful has taken [for Himself] a son.”
89. You have indeed advanced something hideous!
90. The heavens are about to burst, the earth to split asunder, and the mountains to crumble to pieces
91. Because they ascribe a son to the Most Merciful,
92. When it is not appropriate for the Most Merciful that He should take a son.

Explanation (Tafheem-ul-Quran):

1. Verse 88:

• The polytheists of Arabia and the People of the Book (Jews and Christians) falsely claimed that Allah had a son (e.g., Christians called Jesus the “Son of God,” while some pagans considered angels as Allah’s daughters).
• This statement is a grave lie against Allah’s majesty.

1. Verse 89:

• Allah condemns this claim as monstrous and outrageous because attributing offspring to Allah contradicts His absolute Oneness (Tawheed) and perfection.

1. Verses 90-91:

• The claim is so severe that it would cause the heavens, earth, and mountains—symbols of stability—to nearly collapse in outrage at such blasphemy.
• This hyperbolic imagery emphasizes the gravity of shirk (associating partners with Allah).

1. Verse 92:

• Allah declares it entirely unbecoming of His majesty to have a son. He is self-sufficient (As-Samad), needing no offspring, and far above human-like attributes.

Key Takeaways:

• The verses refute the idea of divine sonship (whether applied to Jesus, angels, or others).
• They highlight Allah’s absolute uniqueness and the absurdity of humanizing Him.
• The dramatic imagery (heavens tearing apart) underscores how serious shirk is in Islam.
• Xxxxxxxxx

By Grok

Tafseer from Tafheem-ul-Quran, as sourced from islamicstudies.info:

Translation (Tafheem-ul-Quran):
(19:88) They claim: “The Most Compassionate Lord has taken a son to Himself.”
(19:89) Surely you have made a monstrous statement.
(19:90) The heavens might well-nigh burst thereat, and the earth break asunder, and the mountains fall down in pieces,
(19:91) at their ascribing a son to the Most Compassionate Lord.
(19:92) It does not befit the Most Compassionate Lord that He should take a son.

Tafseer (Explanation) from Tafheem-ul-Quran:
According to Maududi’s commentary, these verses strongly refute the claim made by some groups, particularly certain Christians and polytheists, that God has taken a son. The assertion is described as a “monstrous statement” (shay’an iddan) because it contradicts the fundamental Islamic principle of Tawhid (the oneness of God). The Tafseer explains:

• Verse 88-89: The claim that “The Most Compassionate has taken a son” is not only false but also an outrageous and grave accusation. It is described as an enormity because it attributes to God a human-like quality, which is incompatible with His transcendence and absolute unity. This statement is seen as an affront to the divine nature of Allah, who is free from all imperfections and dependencies.
• Verse 90: The imagery of the heavens nearly bursting, the earth splitting, and the mountains collapsing illustrates the cosmic outrage at such a claim. This hyperbolic language emphasizes the severity of the falsehood, suggesting that the very order of the universe is disrupted by the attribution of a son to God. It underscores the gravity of associating partners or progeny with Allah, which is considered a form of shirk (polytheism).
• Verse 91-92: These verses clarify that attributing a son to God is inappropriate and unbecoming of His majesty. The term “Most Compassionate” (Ar-Rahman) highlights God’s boundless mercy and self-sufficiency, making it illogical and unfitting for Him to need or take a son. The Tafseer notes that this belief stems from a misunderstanding of God’s nature, as human concepts of fatherhood and sonship cannot apply to the Creator, who is eternal and beyond human limitations.

Maududi further explains that this passage is directed at refuting specific theological claims, such as those held by Christians who believe in Jesus as the “Son of God” or by Arab polytheists who attributed offspring to God (e.g., angels as daughters). The verses affirm that Allah is unique, without partners or progeny, and such claims are a distortion of His divine attributes.

This Tafseer underscores the Quranic emphasis on God’s absolute oneness and the rejection of any anthropomorphic or associative beliefs about Him. For further details, you can refer to the full text of Tafheem-ul-Quran on islamicstudies.info.