Introduction of chapter AL Nissa

Good to get some idea about the chapter we are going to read…like perspective, geopolitics at the time, struggles of that time and time immemorial ongoing conflicts.

Following link for complete chapter, translated, explained in details.

https://islamicstudies.info/reference.php?sura=4

Useful site for collection of books for reading, listening, downloading books:

https://www.australianislamiclibrary.org/

Introduction to the chapter:

Based on Sayyid Abul Ala Maududi’s Tafheem-ul-Quran, here is a comprehensive introduction to Surah An-Nisa (Chapter 4), covering its historical context, themes, structure, and significance:


1. Period of Revelation

  • Timeline: Revealed in Medina between the end of A.H. 3 and early A.H. 5 (after the Battle of Uhud, A.H. 3).
  • Key Triggers:
  • Post-Battle of Uhud social crises (inheritance disputes for martyrs, orphan rights) .
  • Jewish opposition (Banu Nadir’s exile in Rabi’ al-Awwal, A.H. 4) .
  • Legislation for wartime practices (e.g., tayammum, shortened prayers during expeditions) .

2. Core Themes and Objectives

I. Social and Family Reform

  • Women & Orphans:
  • Establishes rights to inheritance (vv. 7-12), dowries (v. 4), and protection from exploitation .
  • Prohibits usurping orphans’ wealth (v. 10) and forced marriages .
  • Inheritance Laws: Detailed rules for equitable wealth distribution (vv. 11-12) .
  • Marriage Ethics:
  • Limits polygamy (up to four wives) contingent on fair treatment (v. 3) .
  • Abolishes pre-Islamic practices like inheriting women as property .

II. Community Consolidation

  • Justice Framework:
  • Commands fair judgment (v. 58) and fulfillment of trusts .
  • Orders obedience to Allah, the Prophet, and legitimate authorities (v. 59) .
  • Moral Purity:
  • Prohibits alcohol (v. 43), usury (v. 161), and sexual misconduct (vv. 15-16) .
  • Promotes taqwa (God-consciousness) as the foundation of social cohesion .

III. Defense and Resilience

  • Battle Preparedness:
  • Lessons from Uhud: Critiques disobedience and hypocrisy that led to losses (vv. 73-100) .
  • Legitimizes warfare for self-defense and religious freedom (vv. 71-76) .
  • “Salat al-Khawf”: Guidelines for prayer during military campaigns (v. 102) .

IV. Theological Corrections

  • Critique of People of the Book:
  • Exposes Jewish distortions of scripture and Christian deviations (e.g., Trinity, divinity of Jesus) (vv. 44-57) .
  • Warns against alliances with disbelievers (vv. 138-139) .
  • Hypocrisy: Identifies traits of hypocrites (munafiqun) and calls for vigilance (vv. 88-91, 138-145) .

3. Structural Flow

SectionVersesFocusFamily Laws 1-35 Rights of women, orphans, inheritance, marriage ethics . Community Ethics 36-42 Generosity, trustworthiness, avoiding greed . Purification 43 Tayammum (ablution with dust) during travel . Jewish Critique 44-57 Condemnation of scriptural distortion and hostility . Governance 58-72 Justice, leadership integrity, dispute resolution . Defense 73-100 Post-Uhud resilience, battle ethics, hypocrisy . Final Exhortations 105-176 Accountability, repentance, and eternal reward/punishment .


4. Unique Features in Tafheem-ul-Quran

  • Holistic Approach: Integrates legal injunctions with moral psychology (e.g., analyzing Muslim morale post-Uhud) .
  • Historical Context: Links verses to specific events (e.g., exile of Banu Nadir, Najran Christian delegation) .
  • Theological Clarity: Systematically refutes Trinity using Quranic logic (vv. 171-172) .

5. Virtues and Significance

  • Prophetic Emphasis:

“Whoever recites Surah An-Nisa is like one who spent property in Allah’s path and freed a slave” .

  • Community Blueprint: Serves as a constitution for Muslim society, balancing individual rights with collective stability .

For the full commentary, see Tafheem-ul-Quran: Surah An-Nisa.

Introduction of Chapter Al e Imran

Good to get some idea about the chapter we are going to read like perspective, geopolitics at the time, struggles of that time and time immemorial ongoing conflicts.

Following is the summary of introduction to chapter Al e Imran. A link is attached for free access to the complete chapter with detailed explanations of verses in this chapter. Feel free to download, share with others.

Complete chapter link: https://islamicstudies.info/reference.php?sura=3

Useful site for collection of books for free reading, listening, downloading books:

https://www.australianislamiclibrary.org/

Based on Sayyid Abul Ala Maududi’s Tafhim al-Qur’an (Tafheem-ul-Quran), the introduction to Surah Al Imran (The Family of Imran) covers the following key aspects:

1. Naming and Significance

The surah is named after Āl ʿImrān (the Family of Imran) mentioned in verse 3:33, referring to the lineage of Jesus (AS), including Imran (father of Mary), Maryam (Mary), and Jesus . Unlike Surah Al-Baqarah, which primarily addresses Jews, this surah focuses on correcting Christian theological errors, especially regarding the divinity of Jesus .

2. Revelation Context

  • Medinan Origin: Revealed in Medina, predominantly during years 2–3 AH (after Hijra) .
  • Four Discourses:
  • Verses 1–32: Revealed after the Battle of Badr (2 AH), establishing core theological principles.
  • Verses 33–63: Revealed in 9 AH during the Christian delegation of Najran’s visit.
  • Verses 64–120: Address Jewish deviations and Muslim community cohesion.
  • Verses 121–200: Revealed after the Battle of Uhud (3 AH), analyzing Muslim setbacks .

3. Central Theme: Correcting Deviations

  • Addressing Christians: Refutes the divinity of Jesus (AS) by emphasizing his miraculous birth as a sign of Allah’s power—not his divinity—paralleling Adam’s creation without parents and John the Baptist’s birth to aged parents .
  • Warning Jews: Highlights their scriptural distortions, hypocrisy, and rejection of Muhammad (PBUH) despite his alignment with Abrahamic prophecies .
  • Guiding Muslims: Exposes hypocrites within the community and calls for unity, patience, and adherence to divine guidance amid external threats .

4. Historical Background

  • Post-Badr tensions with Jewish clans (e.g., Banu Qainuqa) who breached treaties and conspired with enemies .
  • Battle of Uhud: A critical test where Muslim moral weaknesses (e.g., greed, disobedience) led to initial defeat. The surah reviews this to instill resilience and divine reliance .
  • Economic strain in Medina due to refugee influx and warfare .

5. Structural Flow

  • Theological Foundation (1–32): Affirms Allah’s oneness, Quranic revelation, and the fate of disbelievers .
  • Lineage of Prophets (33–63): Details the family of Imran, Maryam’s piety, and Jesus’ miracles to restore monotheism .
  • Community Directives (64–200):
  • Da’wah strategies for People of the Book .
  • Analysis of Uhud’s lessons: obedience in battle, rejection of usury, and steadfastness .
  • Final meditation on cosmic signs (190–200) reinforcing Allah’s sovereignty .

6. Key Instructions for Muslims

  • Hold Fast to Unity: Reject divisions and ally only with believers .
  • Learn from History: Avoid the pitfalls of earlier nations (e.g., scriptural corruption, moral decay) .
  • Balance Faith & Action: Enjoin good, forbid evil, and trust Allah’s promise of victory .

Conclusion

Surah Al Imran is a comprehensive blueprint for defending Islamic theology against Judeo-Christian deviations while fortifying Muslim identity through divine guidance and historical introspection. It transitions from doctrinal clarity to practical community resilience, emphasizing Allah’s ultimate authority over all adversities .

For the full Tafheem-ul-Quran commentary, see English Tafsir .

Introduction summary of chapter Al Baqara

Good to get some idea about the chapter we are going to read like perspective, geopolitics at the time, struggles of that time and time immemorial ongoing conflicts.

Following link for complete chapter, translated, explained in details.

https://islamicstudies.info/reference.php?sura=2

Useful site for collection of books for reading, listening, downloading books:

https://www.australianislamiclibrary.org/

Introduction to the chapter:

Based on Tafheem-ul-Quran by Sayyid Abul Ala Maududi, the introduction to Surah Al-Baqarah (The Cow) encompasses the following key aspects:

1. Naming and Significance

  • The surah is named after the story of a cow commanded by Allah to be sacrificed by the Israelites (verses 67–73), illustrating their excessive questioning and evasion of divine orders .
  • The title Al-Baqarah (The Cow) does not indicate the surah’s overarching theme. Translating it literally is misleading, as the surah addresses broad theological, legal, and moral guidance—not bovine symbolism. This naming convention parallels other Quranic surahs titled after distinctive narratives or objects .

2. Revelation Context

  • Medinan Origin: Most of the surah was revealed in Medina during the first two years after the Hijra (migration). Exceptions include verses on interest (revealed later) and the final three verses (284–286), revealed in Mecca but included due to thematic relevance .
  • Historical Shift: In Mecca, the Quran addressed polytheists ignorant of monotheism. In Medina, it engaged Jews—acquainted with concepts like divine unity, prophecy, and revelation—who had deviated from original Mosaic teachings. Over one-third of the surah critiques their religious distortions and moral decline .

3. Central Theme: Divine Guidance

  • The surah responds to Surah Al-Fatihah’s prayer (“Guide us to the straight path”) by declaring the Quran as unequivocal guidance for the God-conscious (verses 1–5) .
  • It contrasts three groups:
    • Believers: Embrace the unseen, establish prayer, give charity, and accept all prophets without distinction .
    • Disbelievers: Reject truth despite warnings, their hearts “sealed” by Allah (verses 6–7) .
    • Hypocrites: Newly emerged in Medina, they feign belief while undermining Muslims—classified as the “most conflicted” and dangerous group .

4. Audience and Objectives

  • Jews of Medina: Critiqued for ritualistic formalism, scriptural distortion, and rejecting Prophet Muhammad despite his alignment with Abrahamic legacy. The Kaaba’s establishment as the new qiblah (prayer direction) symbolizes the transfer of spiritual leadership from them to Muslims (verses 142–152) .
  • Muslim Community: After the Hijra, the surah provides social, legal, and moral frameworks for state-building, including:
    • Laws on prayer, fasting, charity, pilgrimage, and warfare .
    • Condemnation of hypocrisy and economic injustices (e.g., interest) .
  • Survival in Adversity: With non-Muslim Arabia united against Medina, the surah commands perseverance, community cohesion, and principled warfare (e.g., self-defense during sacred months, verse 194) .

5. Structural Flow

  • Opens with theological foundations (belief, disbelief, hypocrisy) .
  • Reviews human history through prophets (Adam, Abraham, Moses) to establish Islam’s continuity with prior revelation .
  • Culminates in practical regulations (verses 177–286) covering ethics, finance, family law, and prayers for divine mercy .

Conclusion

Surah Al-Baqarah is a comprehensive blueprint for individual piety and communal resilience, transitioning from Meccan spiritual tenets to Medinan socio-political order. Its critique of past deviations underscores Islam’s role in restoring Abrahamic monotheism, while its legal injunctions solidify Muslim identity amid external threats .

For further exploration, refer to Tafheem-ul-Quran .

Surah Yusuf,12: 99-104

فَلَمَّا دَخَلُوۡا عَلٰى يُوۡسُفَ اٰوٰٓى اِلَيۡهِ اَبَوَيۡهِ وَقَالَ ادۡخُلُوۡا مِصۡرَ اِنۡ شَآءَ اللّٰهُ اٰمِنِيۡنَؕ‏﴿12:99﴾ وَرَفَعَ اَبَوَيۡهِ عَلَى الۡعَرۡشِ وَخَرُّوۡا لَهٗ سُجَّدًا​ۚ وَقَالَ يٰۤاَبَتِ هٰذَا تَاۡوِيۡلُ رُءۡيَاىَ مِنۡ قَبۡلُقَدۡ جَعَلَهَا رَبِّىۡ حَقًّا​ؕ وَقَدۡ اَحۡسَنَ بِىۡۤ اِذۡ اَخۡرَجَنِىۡ مِنَ السِّجۡنِ وَجَآءَ بِكُمۡ مِّنَ الۡبَدۡوِ مِنۡۢ بَعۡدِ اَنۡ نَّزَغَ الشَّيۡطٰنُ بَيۡنِىۡ وَبَيۡنَ اِخۡوَتِىۡ​ؕ اِنَّ رَبِّىۡ لَطِيۡفٌ لِّمَا يَشَآءُ​ؕ اِنَّهٗ هُوَ الۡعَلِيۡمُ الۡحَكِيۡمُ‏ ﴿12:100﴾رَبِّ قَدۡ اٰتَيۡتَنِىۡ مِنَ الۡمُلۡكِ وَ عَلَّمۡتَنِىۡ مِنۡ تَاۡوِيۡلِ الۡاَحَادِيۡثِ​ ۚ فَاطِرَ السَّمٰوٰتِ وَالۡاَرۡضِ اَنۡتَ وَلِىّٖ فِى الدُّنۡيَا وَالۡاٰخِرَةِ​ ۚ تَوَفَّنِىۡ مُسۡلِمًا وَّاَلۡحِقۡنِىۡ بِالصّٰلِحِيۡنَ‏﴿12:101﴾ ذٰلِكَ مِنۡ اَنۡۢبَآءِ الۡغَيۡبِ نُوۡحِيۡهِ اِلَيۡكَ​ۚ وَمَا كُنۡتَ لَدَيۡهِمۡ اِذۡ اَجۡمَعُوۡۤا اَمۡرَهُمۡ وَهُمۡ يَمۡكُرُوۡنَ‏ ﴿12:102﴾ وَمَاۤ اَكۡثَرُ النَّاسِ وَلَوۡ حَرَصۡتَ بِمُؤۡمِنِيۡنَ‏﴿12:103﴾ وَمَا تَسۡـئَلُهُمۡ عَلَيۡهِ مِنۡ اَجۡرٍ​ؕ اِنۡ هُوَ اِلَّا ذِكۡرٌ لِّـلۡعٰلَمِيۡنَ‏  ﴿12:104﴾

(12:99) And when they went to Joseph,68 he took his parents aside and said (to the members of his family): “Enter the city now, and if Allah wills, you shall be secure.” (12:100) And after they had entered the city, Joseph raised his parents to the throne69 beside himself, and they (involuntarily) bowed in prostration before him.70 Joseph said: “Father! This is the fulfilment of the vision I had before – one that My Lord has caused to come true. He was kind to me when He rescued me from the prison, and brought you from the desert after Satan had stirred discord between me and my brothers. Certainly my Lord is Subtle in the fulfilment of His will; He is All-Knowing, All-Wise. (12:101) My Lord! You have bestowed dominion upon me and have taught me to comprehend the depths of things. O Creator of heavens and earth! You are my Guardian in this world and in the Hereafter. Cause me to die in submission to You, and join me, in the end, with the righteous.”71 (12:102) (O Muhammad), this is part of news from the Unseen that We reveal to you for you were not present with them when Joseph’s brothers jointly resolved on a plot. (12:103) And most of the people, howsoever you might so desire, are not going to believe. (12:104) You do not seek from them any recompense for your service.72 This is merely an admonition to all mankind.73


Notes

68. It is worthwhile to take notice of the total number of Prophet Jacob’s family members that migrated to Egypt with him, for it is closely connected with the problem that is raised concerning the total number of the Israelites who emigrated from there some five hundred years after this. According to the Bible, the total number of the family members was 70, including Prophet Joseph and his two sons, and excluding those daughters-in-law who did not belong to the family of Prophet Jacob. But according to the census figures given in Numbers, their number was about two million when they were counted in the wilderness of Sinai in the second year, after they come out of the land of Egypt. The problem is this: how is it possible that these three score and ten souls of his house had multiplied into two million souls during five hundred years or so? 

It is obvious that no family can multiply to such a large number in five hundred years merely by the generative process. Thus the only other way in which their number could have been increased was proselytism. And there are sound reasons to believe that this must have been so. The Israelites were the descendants of Prophets. They had migrated to Egypt because of the power Prophet Joseph enjoyed there. And we have seen that he made full use of every opportunity he got for carrying out the work of the mission of Prophethood. Therefore it may reasonably be expected that the Israelites would have done their very best to convert the Egyptians to their faith of Islam during the five centuries of their power in Egypt. As a result of this the Egyptian converts to Islam would not only have changed their religion but also their culture so as to make them look quite different from the other Egyptians and look like the Israelites. Naturally the non Muslim Egyptians would have declared them to be foreigners just as the Hindus treat the Indian Muslims of today. By and by they themselves would have accepted this position and become members of the Israelite nationality. Afterwards, when the Egyptian nationalists began to persecute the alien Israelites, the Muslim Egyptians were also made a target of their tyranny. So when the Israelites migrated from Egypt, they, too, left their country along with them and began to be counted among them. 

The above mentioned explanation is confirmed by the Bible also. For instance, it says “that when they left Egypt, the children of Israel journeyed from Remases to Suceoth….and a mixed multitude went up also with them….” (Exodus 12: 37-38) and “the mix multitude that was among them fell a lusting”. (Numbers 11: 4). Then by and by these non-Israelite converts to Islam began to be called the stranger. “One ordinance shall be both for you of the congregation, and also for the stranger that sojourneth with you, an ordinance forever in your generations: as ye are, so shall the stranger be before the Lord. One law and the one manner shall be for you, and for the stranger that sojourneth with you.” (Numbers 15: 15-16). “And I charged your judges at that time, saying: Hear the causes between your brethren, and judge righteously between every man and his brother, and the stranger that is with him.” (Deut. 1: 16). Now it is not an easy thing to find out the exact term which was applied in the original Scriptures to the Egyptian converts to Islam, and which was afterwards changed into the stranger by the translators. 

69. According to the Talmud, “when Joseph learned that his father was upon the way, he gathered together his friends and officers, and soldiers of the realm, attired in rich garments,….and formed a great company to meet Prophet Jacob on the way and escort him to Egypt. Music and gladness filled the land, and all the people, the women and the children, assembled on the house tops to view the magnificent display.” (H. Polano, p. 111). 

70. The interpretation of this verse has given rise to some serious misunderstandings, which are against the very fundamentals of the divine guidance. So much so that some people have gone to the extreme of making it lawful to prostrate before kings and saints as a mark of respect. Others more strict on this point have explained it away, saying, “In the former divine laws, it was unlawful only to prostrate in worship before others than Allah, though it was permissible to prostrate before others if it was done without the intention of worship, but now in the divine law given to Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) it has been made absolutely unlawful. 

Such misunderstandings as these have resulted from taking the words in this verse to mean “to perform sajadah” in the technical sense in which it is now used in the Islamic code, that is, “lying flat in such a way that the hands, the knees and the forehead touch the ground,” whereas the word sujjadan has been used here in its literal meaning of sajud “to bow down”. The parents and brothers of Prophet Joseph bowed down before him in accordance with the ancient custom among the people of the age, (and the custom is still in vogue among some people), who used to bow down before others to show their gratitude, or welcome them, or merely to salute them by placing their hand on the breast. There are many instances of this in the Bible. “….and when he (Abraham) saw them (the three men) corning towards him, he ran to meet them from the tent door, and bowed himself towards the ground.” (Please refer to Arabic translation: Gen. 18: 32). Further on it says that when the children of Heth gave a field and a cave as a burying place for Sarah, Prophet Abraham was so grateful to them that “he stood up and bowed himself to the people of the land, even to the children of Heth,” (Gen. 23: 7) and “Abraham bowed down himself before the people of the land.” (Gen. 23: 12). In both cases the words `bowed down’ have been translated into (Sajada). 

These and other like instances in the Bible are a conclusive proof of the fact that in this (verse 100), the Quran has not used the word in its technical Islamic sense but in its literal sense. 

Besides, those commentators are absolutely wrong who suppose that in the former laws, sajadah in the present Islamic sense was allowed as a mark of respect laws. For instance, during the Babylonian captivity of the Children of Israel, king Ahasuerus promoted Haman above all the princes and commanded all his servants to bow and reverence him, but Mordecai, who was a holy and righteous man among the Jews, bowed not, nor did him reverence. (Esther3: 1-2). The Talmud has elaborated this point in a way that is worth reading: 

The servants of the king said to Mordecai: “Why wilt thou refuse to bow before Haman, transgressing thus the wishes of the king? Do we not bow before him?” “Yea are foolish,” answered Mordecai, “aye, wanting in reason. Listen to me. Shall a mortal, who must return to dust be glorified? Shall I bow down before one born of woman, whose days are short? When he is small he cries and weeps as a child; when he grows older sorrow and sighing are his portion; his days are full of wrath and anger, and at the end he returns to dust. Shall I bow to one like to him? No, I prostrate myself before the Eternal God, who lives forever. To Him the great Creator and Ruler of the Universe, and to no other will I bow.” (The Talmud Selections by H. Polano, p. 172). 

This speech which was made by a believer from among the Israelites a thousand years before the revelation of the Quran, is conclusive on the point. Thus there is absolutely no room for the performance of sajadah before any other than Allah.

71. The few sentences that were uttered by Prophet Joseph (peace be upon him) at the happiest occasion of his life help depict the most graceful pattern of the virtues of a true believer. There is the man from the desert, whom his own brothers had, out of jealousy, attempted to kill, now sitting on the throne after passing through many vicissitudes of life. All the members of his family have been forced by famine to come before him for help. The same jealous brothers, who had made an attempt on his life, are now standing before him with downcast heads. Had there been a “successful man of the world” in his place, he would have used this opportunity for boasting of his greatness and bragging of his successes, and giving vent to his grievances and hurling malicious taunts at his defeated enemies. In utter contrast to this, the true man of God behaves in a quite different way. Instead of boasting and bragging of his own greatness, he is grateful to his God Who had shown grace to him by raising him to such a high position of power, and for arranging his meeting with his people after such a long period of separation. Instead of giving vent to his grievances against his brothers, making taunts at them for their ill treatment, he does not make even a mention of such things but puts up a defense for them, saying that it was all due to Satan, who had stirred up strife between them: nay, he even puts it forward as a blessing in disguise, being one of the mysterious ways of Allah by which He had fulfilled His design of raising him to the throne. After saying these things in a few concise sentences, he at once turns to his Lord in gratitude for bestowing on him kingdom and wisdom, instead of letting him rot in the prison, and prays to Him to keep him as His faithful and obedient servant as long as he was alive, and to join him with the righteous people after his death. What a pure and high pattern of character. 

It is strange that this speech of Prophet Joseph has neither found a place in the Bible nor in the Talmud, though these books are full of irrelevant and unimportant details of this story and others. It is an irony that these Books are void of those things that teach moral values and throw light on the real characters and the mission of the Prophets. Now that this story has come to an end, the readers are again reminded that this story of Prophet Joseph as given in the Quran is not a copy of the story given in the Bible and the Talmud for there are striking differences between them. A comparative study of these Books will show that the story in the Quran differs from that given in the other two Books in several very important parts. The Quran contains additional facts in some cases and omits certain facts in other cases or even refutes some parts as contained in the Bible and the Talmud. Therefore there is absolutely no room for anyone to allege that Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) related this story merely in the form he heard it from the Israelites. 

72. In order to grasp the full significance of the underlying admonition implied in it, we must keep in view the background of the revelation of this story given in the introduction to this Surah. The Quraish themselves had invited the Prophet (peace be upon him) to a meeting that had been arranged for putting him to a test which was to show whether he was a true Prophet or not. When he arrived there, they put this question to him without any previous notice or intimation: why did the Israelites go to Egypt? In answer to this, the Prophet (peace be upon him) recited this Surah then and there. As they themselves knew that this was an abrupt question and there had been no preparation for its answer beforehand, it was expected that they would believe in his Prophethood. But they were so obdurate that they did not believe in him even then. As Allah was aware of their intentions, he informed His Messenger beforehand, as if to say: Though you have come out successful in the test, to which they themselves put to you, yet most of them are not going to believe it because they are not sincere in their quest for the truth. That is why they will not believe even now when the revelation of this Surah has proved conclusively that the Quran is not being forged by you but is being sent down by Allah Himself. As their real aim and intention is to reject your message anyhow, they will now invent another excuse for their denial. 

This is not meant to remove any misunderstanding the Prophet (peace be upon him) might have cherished, but is merely an indirect warning to the questioners that Allah knew their intentions well. This was meant to warn them like this: O obdurate people, this Surah has been placed before you to serve as a mirror for you. You demanded a proof from Our Messenger that he was not forging the Quran: had you been reasonable and sincere people, you would have accepted the truth that has been established according to your own test, but you are obdurate people and are still denying it. 

73. This is another admonition more subtle than the one given above. Though this, too, has been addressed to the Prophet (peace be upon him), it is meant for the unbelievers, as if to say: O people, consider your attitude towards the message from another point of view. Had you noticed anything in the mission and the message of Our Prophet that might have smelt of any self interest whatsoever, you would have been justified in rejecting it as the work of a selfish person. But you yourselves have experienced it that he has absolutely no self interest in his work and demands no recompense for the message, which is nothing but instruction for all the people of the world. Therefore you should listen to it and consider it without prejudice and make your decisions about it on merit and merit alone.

Surah Al-Baqarah, 2:93-93

وَاِذۡ اَخَذۡنَا مِيۡثَاقَكُمۡ وَرَفَعۡنَا فَوۡقَکُمُ الطُّوۡرَ ؕ خُذُوۡا مَآ اٰتَيۡنٰکُمۡ بِقُوَّةٍ وَّاسۡمَعُوۡا ​ ؕ قَالُوۡا سَمِعۡنَا وَعَصَيۡنَا  وَاُشۡرِبُوۡا فِىۡ قُلُوۡبِهِمُ الۡعِجۡلَ بِکُفۡرِهِمۡ ​ؕ قُلۡ بِئۡسَمَا يَاۡمُرُکُمۡ بِهٖۤ اِيۡمَانُكُمۡ اِنۡ كُنۡتُمۡ مُّؤۡمِنِيۡنَ‏ ﴿2:93﴾

(2:93) Recall the covenant We made with you and caused the Mount to tower above you, stressing: “Hold to what We have given you with full strength and give heed to it.” But their forefathers said: “We hear, but we disobey” – for their hearts were overflowing with love for the calf because of their unbelief. Say: “If you are people of faith, then evil are the things that your faith enjoins upon you.” 


Notes

Surah 2 Al-Baqarah, Ayat 75-77

Audio discussion of the summary:

https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/6dc0b7b0-dd5f-4f62-9b6b-52c9d8f36a38/audio

اَفَتَطۡمَعُوۡنَ اَنۡ يُّؤۡمِنُوۡا لَـكُمۡ وَقَدۡ كَانَ فَرِيۡقٌ مِّنۡهُمۡ يَسۡمَعُوۡنَ کَلَامَ اللّٰهِ ثُمَّ يُحَرِّفُوۡنَهٗ مِنۡۢ بَعۡدِ مَا عَقَلُوۡهُ وَهُمۡ يَعۡلَمُوۡنَ‏ ﴿2:75﴾ وَاِذَا لَـقُوۡا الَّذِيۡنَ اٰمَنُوۡا قَالُوۡآ اٰمَنَّا  ۖۚ وَاِذَا خَلَا بَعۡضُهُمۡ اِلٰى بَعۡضٍ قَالُوۡآ اَ تُحَدِّثُوۡنَهُمۡ بِمَا فَتَحَ اللّٰهُ عَلَيۡكُمۡ لِيُحَآجُّوۡكُمۡ بِهٖ عِنۡدَ رَبِّكُمۡ​ؕ اَفَلَا تَعۡقِلُوۡنَ‏﴿2:76﴾ اَوَلَا يَعۡلَمُوۡنَ اَنَّ اللّٰهَ يَعۡلَمُ مَا يُسِرُّوۡنَ وَمَا يُعۡلِنُوۡنَ‏  ﴿2:77﴾

(2:75) Do you hope that these people will believe in the Message you are preaching,86even though a party of them has been wont to listen to the Word of Allah and after they had fully grasped it, knowingly distorted it?87 (2:76) And when they meet those who believe (in Muhammad) they say: “We too believe in him.” But in their intimate meetings they say to one another: “How foolish! Why should you intimate to them what Allah has revealed to you, for they will use it as argument against you before your Lord?”88 (2:77) Are they unaware that Allah knows all that they hide and all that they disclose? 


Notes

86. This is addressed to the converts of Madina, who had then lately embraced the faith of the Arabian Prophet. These people had some vague notions about Prophethood, Heavenly Scriptures, Angels, the After-life, Divine Law and so on, and for this they were indebted to their Jewish neighbours. It was from these same Jewish neighbours that they had heard that another Prophet was about to appear, and that his followers would prevail over the rest of the world.

It was partly because of this background that when the people of Madina heard about the Prophet, they readily turned towards him and embraced Islam in large numbers. They naturally expected that those who already followed Prophets and Divine Scriptures, and who, by introducing them to these ideas had contributed to their embracing the true faith, would not only join the ranks of the true believers, but would even be amongst their vanguard. As a result of these expectations the enthusiastic Muslim converts approached their Jewish friends and neighbours and invited them to embrace Islam. When the Jews flatly declined to do so, this negative reply was exploited by the hypocrites and other enemies of Islam as an argument for creating doubts about the truth of Islam. 

If Muhammad was the true Prophet, they argued, how was it conceivable that the Jewish scholars and divines would deliberately turn away from him since, if he was a true Prophet, such a behaviour would be tantamount to ruining their After-life? Here the simple-hearted Muslims learn of the historical record of the Jews, a record which is replete with perversion and corruption. This was designed to make them realize that they ought not to expect too much of a people with so dark a past, for if they were not realistic in their expectations about them they would be utterly disappointed when their call failed to penetrate their hardened and stony hearts. Their chronic decadence had a history of several centuries. For a long time they had treated those verses of the Scriptures which made sincere believers tremble in awe as objects of jest and play. They had tailored religion to suit their base desires and it was around such a perverted view of religion that all their hopes of salvation were centred. It was futile to hope that such people would flock to the call of Truth the moment it was proclaimed. 

87. ‘A party of them’ refers to the scholars and religious doctors of the Jewish community. The’ Word of God’ here signifies the Torah, the Psalms (Zabur) and other Scriptures which the Jews had received through the Prophets. ‘Distortion’ denotes the attempt to twist a text in such a manner as to make it signify something different from its real meaning, and may also denote tampering with the text of the Scriptures. The Israelite scholars had subjected the Scriptures to distortions of both kinds. 

88. When the Jews talked among themselves they asked their co-religionists to disclose to the Muslims neither the prophesies about the Prophet, nor those verses of the Scriptures on the basis of which they could be reproached for their evil conduct; they thought that the Muslims would make use of scriptural arguments against them before God, and would thus have them pronounced guilty. These were the depths to which Jewish religious decadence had sunk. They were convinced that if they could succeed in concealing their guilt in this world, they would be saved from censure in the Next. For this reason they were asked if they considered God to be unaware of their deeds, either apparent or hidden.

Surah 2 Al-Baqarah, Ayat 72-74

Audio discussion of the summary:

https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/297c9148-9681-49ed-a324-b19fa8800d2b/audio

وَ اِذۡ قَتَلۡتُمۡ نَفۡسًا فَادّٰرَءۡتُمۡ فِيۡهَا ​ؕ وَاللّٰهُ مُخۡرِجٌ مَّا كُنۡتُمۡ تَكۡتُمُوۡنَۚ‏ ﴿2:72﴾ فَقُلۡنَا اضۡرِبُوۡهُ بِبَعۡضِهَا ​ؕ كَذٰلِكَ يُحۡىِ اللّٰهُ الۡمَوۡتٰى ۙ وَيُرِيۡکُمۡ اٰيٰتِهٖ لَعَلَّكُمۡ تَعۡقِلُوۡنَ‏﴿2:73﴾ ثُمَّ قَسَتۡ قُلُوۡبُكُمۡ مِّنۡۢ بَعۡدِ ذٰلِكَ فَهِىَ كَالۡحِجَارَةِ اَوۡ اَشَدُّ قَسۡوَةً ​ ؕ وَاِنَّ مِنَ الۡحِجَارَةِ لَمَا يَتَفَجَّرُ مِنۡهُ الۡاَنۡهٰرُ​ؕ وَاِنَّ مِنۡهَا لَمَا يَشَّقَّقُ فَيَخۡرُجُ مِنۡهُ الۡمَآءُ​ؕ وَاِنَّ مِنۡهَا لَمَا يَهۡبِطُ مِنۡ خَشۡيَةِ اللّٰهِ​ؕ وَمَا اللّٰهُ بِغَافِلٍ عَمَّا تَعۡمَلُوۡنَ‏ ﴿2:74﴾

(2:72) And recall when you killed a man and then began to remonstrate and cast the blame (of killing) upon one another even though Allah was determined to bring to light what you were hiding. (2:73) Then We ordered: “Smite the corpse with a part of it.” Thus does Allah bring the dead to life and thus does He show His Signs that you might understand.85 (2:74) Then (even after observing this) your hearts hardened and became like stones, or even harder. For surely there are some stones from which streams burst forth and some that split asunder and water issues out, and some that crash down for fear of Allah. Allah is not heedless of the things you do.


Notes

85. At least one thing becomes clear from this statement: that the slain person was restored to life at least long enough to indicate his assassins. But the actual words in which the order ‘smite the corpse with a part of it’ is couched tend to create a measure of ambiguity. Nevertheless, the meaning inferred by the early Qur’anic commentators – that the order was to smite the slain man’s body with some part of the slaughtered cow – seems to me plausible. Two birds were thus killed with one stone: first, they were made to behold a sign of God’s power; and second, the notion that the cow possessed any holiness or sanctity was shattered. For if the of the object of their worship – the cow – had any supernatural power, some calamity should have visited them as a consequence of slaughtering it. But no calamity took place. On the contrary, killing the cow seemed to be beneficial insofar as striking a dead man with a part of it brought him back to life.

Surah 2 Al-Baqarah, Ayat 67-71

Audio discussion of the summary:

https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/d72be9b4-36ed-4e4b-910a-a3fb13fea1d6/audio

وَاِذۡ قَالَ مُوۡسٰى لِقَوۡمِهٖۤ اِنَّ اللّٰهَ يَاۡمُرُكُمۡ اَنۡ تَذۡبَحُوۡا بَقَرَةً ​ ؕ قَالُوۡآ اَتَتَّخِذُنَا هُزُوًۡا ​ؕ قَالَ اَعُوۡذُ بِاللّٰهِ اَنۡ اَكُوۡنَ مِنَ الۡجٰـهِلِيۡنَ‏﴿2:67﴾ قَالُوا ادۡعُ لَنَا رَبَّكَ يُبَيِّنۡ لَّنَا مَا هِىَ​ؕ قَالَ اِنَّهٗ يَقُوۡلُ اِنَّهَا بَقَرَةٌ لَّا فَارِضٌ وَّلَا بِكۡرٌؕ عَوَانٌۢ بَيۡنَ ذٰلِكَ​ؕ فَافۡعَلُوۡا مَا تُؤۡمَرُوۡنَ‏ ﴿2:68﴾ قَالُوا ادۡعُ لَنَا رَبَّكَ يُبَيِّنۡ لَّنَا مَا لَوۡنُهَا ​ؕ قَالَ اِنَّهٗ يَقُوۡلُ اِنَّهَا بَقَرَةٌ صَفۡرَآءُۙ فَاقِعٌ لَّوۡنُهَا تَسُرُّ النّٰظِرِيۡنَ‏  ﴿2:69﴾قَالُوا ادۡعُ لَنَا رَبَّكَ يُبَيِّنۡ لَّنَا مَا هِىَۙ اِنَّ الۡبَقَرَ تَشٰبَهَ عَلَيۡنَا ؕ وَاِنَّـآ اِنۡ شَآءَ اللّٰهُ لَمُهۡتَدُوۡنَ‏ ﴿2:70﴾ قَالَ اِنَّهٗ يَقُوۡلُ اِنَّهَا بَقَرَةٌ لَّا ذَلُوۡلٌ تُثِيۡرُ الۡاَرۡضَ وَلَا تَسۡقِى الۡحَـرۡثَ ​ۚ مُسَلَّمَةٌ لَّا شِيَةَ فِيۡهَا ​ؕ قَالُوا الۡـٰٔـنَ جِئۡتَ بِالۡحَـقِّ​ؕ فَذَبَحُوۡهَا وَمَا كَادُوۡا يَفۡعَلُوۡنَ‏ ﴿2:71﴾

(2:67) And then recall when Moses said to his people: “Behold, Allah commands you to slaughter a cow.” They said: “Are you jesting with us?” Moses answered: “I seek refuge in Allah that I should behave in the manner of the ignorant.” (2:68) They said: “Pray to your Lord that He make clear to us what she is like.” Moses answered: “He says, she is a cow, neither old nor immature, but of an age in between the two. Do, then, what you have been commanded.” (2:69) They said: “Pray to your Lord that He make clear to us of what colour she is.” Moses answered: “He says, she is a yellow cow, with a bright colour which is pleasing to those who see!” (2:70) They said: “Pray to your Lord that He make clear to us what cow she is. Cows seem much alike to us, and if Allah wills, we shall be guided.”84 (2:71) Moses answered: “Lo! He says, she is a cow unyoked to plough the earth or to water the tillage, one that has been kept secure, with no blemish on her!” Thereupon they cried out: “Now you have come forth with the information that will direct us aright.” And they slaughtered her although they scarcely seemed to do so. 


Notes

84. Through contact with neighbouring peoples, the Israelites had become infested with the attitude of sanctifying the cow, in fact they had even become accustomed to cow-worship. In order to disabuse the Jews of this, they were ordered to slaughter the cow. Their professed belief that God alone was worthy of worship could be tested only by making them slaughter with their own hands what they had formerly worshipped. This test was indeed a hard one since their hearts were not fully imbued with faith. Hence, they tried to shelve the issue by resorting to enquiries about the kind of animal they were required to slaughter. But the more they enquired, the narrower the strait became for them, until the indications were as obvious as if someone had put his finger precisely on the particular animal they were required to slaughter – the animal which had for so long been an object of their worship. The Old Testament also mentions the incident, but there is no reference to the manner in which the Jews tried to evade the matter. (See Numbers 19: 1-10.)

Surah 2 Al-Baqarah, Ayat 65-66

Audio discussion of the summary:

https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/c1da0fbb-91b0-4f72-a86e-69c0c33fadc8/audio

وَلَقَدۡ عَلِمۡتُمُ الَّذِيۡنَ اعۡتَدَوۡا مِنۡكُمۡ فِىۡ السَّبۡتِ فَقُلۡنَا لَهُمۡ كُوۡنُوۡا قِرَدَةً خَاسِـِٔـيۡنَ ​ۚ‏ ﴿2:65﴾ فَجَعَلۡنٰهَا نَكٰلاً لِّمَا بَيۡنَ يَدَيۡهَا وَمَا خَلۡفَهَا وَمَوۡعِظَةً لِّلۡمُتَّقِيۡنَ‏ ﴿2:66﴾

(2:65) And you know the case of those of you who broke the Sabbath,82 how We said to them: “Become apes, despised and hated.”83 (2:66) And thus We made their end a warning for the people of their own time and for the succeeding generations, and an admonition to the God-fearing.


Notes

82. Sabbath, i.e., Saturday . It was laid down that the Israelite should consecrate that day for rest and worship. They were required to from abstain from all worldly acts, including cooking (which they might neither do themselves, nor have their servants do for them). The injunctions, in this connection were so strict that violation of the Sabbath was to be punished with death. (See Exodus 31:12-17. ) When religious and moral decadence, however, spread among the Israelites they indulged in open desecration of the Sabbath, so much so that in Jewish towns trade and commerce were carried out in broad daylight. 

83. The details of this incident are mentioned later in (Surah 7, vv. 163) ff. The exact manner in which their transformation into apes took place is disputed. Some scholars are of the opinion that the transformation was a physical one, while others hold that they were invested with the attributes characteristic of apes. But both the words and the manner in which this incident is recounted in the Qur’an seem to suggest that what took place was a physical transformation of certain persons into apes rather than just a moral metamorphosis. What seems plausible to me is that while their minds were allowed to remain intact, their bodies were changed into those of apes.

Surah 2 Al-Baqarah, Ayat 63-64

Audio discussion of the summary:

https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/ea019385-9bf6-4b0b-8e59-d3f197c0c420/audio

وَاِذۡ اَخَذۡنَا مِيۡثَاقَكُمۡ وَرَفَعۡنَا فَوۡقَكُمُ الطُّوۡرَؕ خُذُوۡا مَآ اٰتَيۡنٰكُمۡ بِقُوَّةٍ وَّ اذۡكُرُوۡا مَا فِيۡهِ لَعَلَّكُمۡ تَتَّقُوۡنَ‏ ﴿2:63﴾ ثُمَّ تَوَلَّيۡتُمۡ مِّنۡۢ بَعۡدِ ذٰلِكَ​​ۚ فَلَوۡلَا فَضۡلُ اللّٰهِ عَلَيۡكُمۡ وَرَحۡمَتُهٗ لَـكُنۡتُمۡ مِّنَ الۡخٰسِرِيۡنَ‏ ﴿2:64﴾

(2:63) And recall when We made a covenant with you and caused the Mount Sinai to tower above you,81 (saying): “Hold fast to the Book that We have given you, and remember the directives and commandments in it, that you be pious.” (2:64) Then you turned away from your covenant, and had it not been for Allah’s grace and mercy upon you, you would have long been utter losers. 


Notes

81. From the manner in which this incident is described at various places in the Qur’an it is obvious that, at that time, it was quite well known to the Israelites. It is difficult, however, after the Passage of many centuries to be able to speak with certainty about the precise nature of the incident. All we can say is that while the Children of Israel were making their covenant in the shadow of Mount Sinai, they witnessed an awesome phenomenon and felt as if the mountain was about to fall upon them. (Verse 171 of Surah al-A’raf) seems to portray this. See also (n. 132 in that surah.)